2. I been getting to grips with the Castleton Needham will data. It's more confusing than I thought it would be. In fact I've found more Needham's and can't sort then out. Still there are more trees
3. I've been looking at my DNA profile which I got from 23andMe as part of a research project. It looks interesting and I've read a couple of books on the topic. I'm thinking of getting a YDNA profile. Any interest
4. My email link with webtrees isn't working so I've had a backlog of mail to deal with. See below:
4.1 From MN
Joseph
Needham
|
|||
I have don some of my
family tree and want to augment some of what you have.
|
To MN
I'm terribly
sorry for the delay in replying but I've been having problems with the Webtrees
software not forwarding my email's. I thought I'd solved it but clearly this is
not the case.
I'm hope you found the web site of use; it's there to provide information for others to use and to correct mistakes I've made. And there are many
You have raised an issue about Joseph Needham in my Norton tree. The problem I have is that there are a number of Joseph Needham's in the tree and I'm unsure which one you are referring to. If you'd like to be more specific I'll try and answer any issue you have with what I've done. If you just want to use the information on the site I have no problem with you doing that although I would ask that you acknowledge where you got the data from
I see like me you are a Needham and no doubt you realise it's a big family. When I started out on the Needham study I hadn't realised the scale of the task I had set myself. But as the site has become better used I've come into contact with a growing number of people, like yourself, who are building Needham family trees some in regions of the country where I have done little work to date. So in short I'd welcome any feedback you might have with what I've done and if you can help in anyway with the task I could do with anything you are able to provide.
I hope you found the site easy to navigate and find the info you were after and I look forward to future correspondence
I'm hope you found the web site of use; it's there to provide information for others to use and to correct mistakes I've made. And there are many
You have raised an issue about Joseph Needham in my Norton tree. The problem I have is that there are a number of Joseph Needham's in the tree and I'm unsure which one you are referring to. If you'd like to be more specific I'll try and answer any issue you have with what I've done. If you just want to use the information on the site I have no problem with you doing that although I would ask that you acknowledge where you got the data from
I see like me you are a Needham and no doubt you realise it's a big family. When I started out on the Needham study I hadn't realised the scale of the task I had set myself. But as the site has become better used I've come into contact with a growing number of people, like yourself, who are building Needham family trees some in regions of the country where I have done little work to date. So in short I'd welcome any feedback you might have with what I've done and if you can help in anyway with the task I could do with anything you are able to provide.
I hope you found the site easy to navigate and find the info you were after and I look forward to future correspondence
4.2 From PD
James Needham 1763-1847
|
||||||||||||
I am descended from
George Needham 1796-1860 son of James Needham. Without offence, please may I
point out that the web site describes George as a half- brother to his
siblings. I believe this to be wrong as James was married to Mary at the time
George was born. We think that the Ellen recorded as his mother was in fact
James' mother and that James stated her name in error. We have found previous
instances of this in the family records.On the original P.R. registering the
birth, an unusually large gap has been left for the mother's name in which
the name Ellen has been entered. I suspect it may have been added later as
the handwriting could possibly be different.
To PD
I'm terribly sorry for the delay in replying but I've been having problems with the Webtrees software not forwarding my email's. I thought I'd solved it but clearly this is not the case. I'm hope you found the web site of use; it's there to provide information for others to use and to correct mistakes I've made. And there are many. I must admit I always did find it strange that James could have had children by two women and that George was born sandwiched between Mary and Samuel whose mother was Mary Smith. In fact in the cold light of day I shouldn't have put the entry in for George's birth if I thought Ellen was the mother as it is not consistent with the rest of the records. Your explanation is much more likely; and I do remember some reference to the gap left for the mothers name and the possibility it had been added later. I'll amend my tree and records. Are there any other issues you have with the tree? Do you agree that James's parents were Humphrey (1734-1784) and Ellen Sharlock, that Humphrey's parents were John (1705 - ?) and Ellen and that John's father was Thomas. If you are in agreement have you managed to go any further back with the tree. I'd be grateful of some help. Thanks again for the feedback. I am too long in the tooth to take offence and in fact I'd much rather people point out errors/inconsistencies so that they can be corrected. I trust you found the site easy to navigate and interrogate
4.3 From BN
|
No comments:
Post a Comment